>>2633851Utterly cancerous post. You seem to have either went in with the wrong kind of expectations or are just plain trolling. Amaburi masters the art of being sexual without being overly reliant on direct exposure.(just look at sento) It's tastefully sexual yet never crude with it's fanservice. My post also highlighted the brilliant production value on the ecchi series to be one of the main draws. Not a mention of that from your post so it seems like you are just trolling.
>not a single nipple to be seenYou sound like you just wanted a poorly made hentai.(of which there are many)
>blandWhat an absurd thing to say. There are objective quantifiers for sex appeal. i.e focus on breasts, curves etc.. Ecchi will require those same specific things. Genericity is a requirement. By your braindead logic we should just remove women from heterosexual ecchi. That would be "novel", "creative" and "original". It would also be obviously stupid and unappealing.
