>>2814871I kinda get it, like im sorta on the fence on if
>>2814766 is a AI render or not - this is certainly within a humans capability, but I think if you took the time to draw that you'd put your name on it.... pretty sure it is AI.
Sorry, ocd has taken hold now, so m really curious. Is it like a "beware its AI, they took our jobs" type deally? or is it more of a artworld snobbery type thing.
I think science and tech is allowed to make art. Look at Picasso, cubism was created by trying to put down the higher spatial dimensions on canvas - the idea of more than 3 dimensions being contemporary science at the time. I have portrait de Dora Maar as my wallpaper, my mum saw and and said what the hell is that ugly shit on ur phone (unpopular opinions)
Makes ya think, who knows how we will look back at AI "art" Now, if you'll excuse me; i'm going to go masturbate.
