>>782601i think it just draws unnecessary attention and validation to something that's mundane squabbling at best and one-sided obsession at worst.
there isn't anyone involved i'd trust to make a well-rounded comic about it, anyway. anyone who takes you up on that has a bridge they want to sell you in a 2-for-1 deal. the perspective on either "side" would be meaningless. it's not worth the hassle, especially when half the people in there would rather it be over.
