>>1456428>Ad hominem refers to a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument>So I’ll take it you don’t have any scientific or engineering background.how *would* that change the logic of my argument?
>And apparently you don’t have a job because you’re spamming 4chan 24/7how *would* that change my argument?
also im sorry that writing a few thousand words takes so long for you that you assume if a person writes a couple thousand words that would take up their entire day?
https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_hominem>Ad hominem (Latin for "to the person"), short for argumentum ad hominem, typically refers to a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argumentso i am assuming you have very poor english communication skills and cannot reliably discern a valid argument from a invalid argument?
also im not the anon youre referring to, or at least i dont think i am.. it's pretty sad that you think responding in depth to a person's shitty ideas means "spamming"
also you are leading the witness
also you have wasted enough of my time today that i wont be able to respond but let the record show that you are attempting to use a proven LOGICALLY FALLACIOUS argument technique and have forfeited addressing any of the logical arguments i have provided.. it is a typical leftist technique to sidestep anyone pointing out their clear hypocrisy
https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_hominem>Ad hominem (Latin for "to the person"), short for argumentum ad hominem, typically refers to a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument 