>>1161893>Yeah, that's actually a lot.NO IT ISNT WHEN YOU CONSIDER THE BENEFITS! THIS IS ALL YOUR ARGUMENT HINGES UPON AND THE REST OF WHAT YOU SAID IS FUCKING STRAWMAN. THE ONLY THING THAT STOPS BIOFUEL FROM BEING USED IN AVIATION IS THE ***CURRENT DESIGNS*** ARE OPTIMIZED FOR KEROSENE AND EVEN THEN THEY COULD STILL BE USED WITH OLIVE OIL AT LESS THAN MTOW! IT WOULD BE WORTH IT IF BIOFUEL WAS CHEAPER!
YOU ARE THE FUCKER ADVOCATING FOR BATTERIES! BATTERIES ARE LITERALLY NOT EVEN 1 TENTH OF WHAT FUCKING KEROSENE OR BIOFUEL CAN HOLD WITH REGARDS TO ENERGY!!!!! ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME!? IF YOU ARE COMPLAINING ABOUT 20 PERCENT ENERGY LOSS THEN HOW THE FUCK ARE YOU STILL ADVOCATING FOR BATTERIES THAT ARE AN ORDER OF MAGNITUDE LESS THAN BIOFUEL?
ARE YOU TRYING TO SAY THAT WE SHOULD USE ELECTRICITY TO PRODUCE SYNTHETIC FUEL OR SOMETHING? THAT TAKES SO MUCH MORE ENERGY AND COST THAN BIOFUEL WHICH IS A FUCKING CHEAP AS FUCK AND EFFICIENT PASSIVE PROCESS!!!!!!!!! AND EVEN THEN IT WOULD PROBABLY BE EASIER TO TURN VEGETABLE OIL INTO KEROSENE THAN HYDROGEN INTO KEROSENE!
>We're talking about planes in this thread.You brought up the industry as a whole and there are already commercial jets flying with blends of biofuel and kerosene.
>we don't have to dedicate arable landDID YOU NOT SEE THE PICTURES? THESE ARE TUBES FUEL OF GREEN GOOP?!?!? NOT SOME KIND OF CROP!! THIS IS THE POSTER CHILD FOR VERTICAL FARMING!!!!! YOU COULD HAVE SKYCRAPER OF TUBES WITH ALGAE IN THEM AND THEY WOULD PRODUCE A SHIT TON OF BIOFUEL!! A COMPARABLE SOLAR PLANT LITERALLY TAKES UP ACRES AND ACRES!
>There's no reason to concentrate all production on a single limited resource HOLY SHIT MOTHER FUCKER NOTHING IS MORE DECENTRALIZED THAN BIOFUEL PRODUCTION!
>that's gross man. AWww reeeeee some more over green tubes ahahah
>Algae farms aren't productive.YES THEY ARE AND THEY ARE GETTING MORE PRODUCTIVE! THEY CAN BE MADE ON THE OCEAN TO OR OFFSHORE!! NO LAND NECESSARY EVEN!
