>>1977208The horrible regulations that are forcing zoomers into homelessness look something like the following:
>developer buys a bunch of high-value land intending to demolish the moderately profitable building and build something else even more profitable>zoning limits it to 6 stories with a 10 foot setback, developer wants 10 stories with a 6 foot setback>developer applies for the change>local elected officials and community board receive public input>feedback sent to citywide planning commissioners for their nonbinding recommendation>city legislative body approves or denies based on democratic processes>>1977208>I wonder if you believe inWhy yes, I do believe in "incredibly restrictive" regulations in other arenas, yes. For instance, I don't want dioxins and PCBs dumped upstream from me. I don't like unlicensed and uninsured drunk drivers to drive around running over people. I think financial professionals should be restricted from creating intentionally opaque instruments to conceal risk for their own personal gain and crashing the entire economy while getting bailouts for their own fuckups. I think our brave heroes with "The Punisher" tattoos on their biceps should have to answer to someone every time they fire dozens of bullets into a crowd while chasing someone down fifth avenue, hitting nine random bystanders in the process of taking down the guy they were after.
In short, you could say I'm basically a stalinist and I absolutely LOVE the nanny state, any other questions?
