>>1973644As said, there exists no "Civilian" nuclear technology in the world.
Everything is either tied to the Military Industrial Complex or ran by state. If Lockheed Martin lose their status as a participant in the MIC: they won't be able to build reactors anymore. The same is true of the Chebol firms in Korea making reactors, they are essentially in the same position as Lockheed Martin and a bunch of other companies in the same position.
I think you are either ignorant, or are very confused over the words the field and politics picked to describe the field.
Even if one of the companies that want to build smaller modular reactors manage to do it, that is by itself not "Civilian" by any definition either. A friendly government can then buy some black boxes that is most likely cost effective, and you will still have to fly in experts working in the Military Industrial Complex for maintenance and expansion.
Civilian use != Civilian ownership
