>>1280359>sagyes, i'm replacing a suntour xct 100 mm travel. considering your words, i must measure the sag when i'm over the bike. thanks for that advice. in real workout the fork doesn't travel more than 20 mm, and works like shit because it's fucked up after 11K km.
>carbonI'm not in fatty biking, so i will take up your advice in this thing. but i'm in doubt with carbon, because i don't want to expend money in cheap carbon. for cheap solution i preffer aluminum fork instead shitty carbon.
do you think this option
https://www.carboncycles.cc/index.php?p=1766 is good enough to survive my trips, in paths as pic related? ( example:
https://es.wikiloc.com/rutas-mountain-bike/reformacion-del-camino-del-agua-29662761 ,
https://es.wikiloc.com/rutas-mountain-bike/tomas-longitudinal-cortafuegos-belloto-norte-25488783 ).
>>1280360>carbon safetyyes... is better for me pay for a good aluminum than a shitty carbon. but i would pay a good carbon fork if it worth the
>chinkshitactually i'm using 2.25' tyres chaoyang victory to do paths like pic related. do you consider that it's necessary a thing better than the op's pasak fork for that?
sorry about engrish
