>>1962859>it's NA 'urbanists'Yeah OP just thinks it's Euros. Euros still often underestimate how big the US is.
>>1962918I can't refute every half-assed railnerd meme and slippery disingenuous argument in every post, especially when you dumbasses aren't even trying to get your mind around the simple implications of density.
>>1962977>Nope.Are you mentally retarded?
Japan is a narrow island country. There are 126 million people living in about 377,975 square kilometers. Even WITHOUT counting the mountains that favor coastal living, the country still has a density of 330/sqkm. The East Coast states have close to Japan's population; 124 million people from Maine to Florida. But where Japan's population is crammed into 377k sqkm, in the US they occupy 1,228,902 sqkm, for a density of about 100/sqkm.
The entirety of Japan is 3 times more dense than the east coast of the US.
>going to have a lower population density than NYC.The fuck kind of comparison is this? NYC is the densest place in the entire country and the MTA is the largest transit system in the country by an order of magnitude. That just reinforces the point.
