>>1095764What do you think caused the mid evil warming period? The danger is that we are overlooking some other phenomenon that is warming the planet and also the carbon tax is authoritarian and unethical. If saudi arabia started burning hydro carbon at some huge giagantic rate then obviously that could have an effect but for transportation there is NO reason to focus on electric energy so badly except for political reasons which is gay and dishonest. Transportation, even by super libjew standards, is quoted to be only 10 percent of global warming (probably less) so mucking around with toxic lithium batteries that overheat is unnecessary and futile.
Some vids you might get a kick out of:
Randall Carlson hippie Phd climate scientist:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3wAKVz_lKv0 Lindybiege aka Lloyd:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ZHnjDJpkVcAnd I think that alternatives like solar and wind energy, even nuclear, are great initiatives but I cant stand the bad science on the left and the bias they have for political reasons. Scientists can lose their job if they are skeptical of the narrative which is dangerous for science in general. And also I dont think that taxing carbon is ethical and its authoritarian, but if I think that federal subsidies to increase alternative energy development is ethical. Its like the difference between trying to teach a child by punishing them versus positive reinforcement. Animals exhale carbon dioxide so putting a tax on it seems orwellian also and another solution would be not cutting down rain forests but no body talks about that and there are just a lot of factors and dishonesty which seems to be used for egotistical authoritarian reasons.
Although there might be a reason to stop people from emitting carbon so much but the fact that people are so emotional about it makes it seem less credible.
