>>1776519literally nobody in this thread has said or implied that, and even an egregiously bad-faith interpretation of
>>1776446 would struggle to reach that conclusion. I can only conclude that you're spewing the most insane things you can come up with to try and start an argument that nobody's interested in having.
Let's get this thread back on track- anybody have any cool Concorde memorabilia? All I have is this water glass they used onboard.
