>>1918998If service vehicles do not require roads, or, roads with much capacity, then building those roads and allowing/encouraging personal traffic at scale on the roads is NOT just a bonus, because those service vehicles did not require it to begin with, they are not the primary purpose, they are not the purpose at all, they can just as easily operate under a different system.
Do you think pedestrianized places which do not prioritize car traffic don't have efficient delivery or emergency or services services? What you're saying doesn't make sense.
Having profligate roads for everyone to drive on is done for that reason. Don't make excuses.
>>1918998>muh trucks Don't generate more carbon. I highly doubt they're more significant by any metric. And they don't operate in identical zones.
you think places like the Netherlands don't have efficient freight/trucking/industry?
