>>1480212>Christ almighty anonThat's a true statement. Shouting "it has conclusions I don't like so I'm just going to ignore" is nothing but retardation.
>Dubious claimAn actual NASA document was quoted.
Is NASA biased about this too? They don't know their own vehicle?
>Each Shuttle orbiter was designed to experience up to 100 launches and returns. Its thermal protection system had to be robustenough to stand repeated heating loads and the structural rigors of reentry.
>not the entire storySource? What else to the "story" of the number of launches and landings an orbiter could safely perform (which ended up being far more than any of them actually did) could there be
>And drubbing you with it>never has sources for statements (because they don't exist) >contests even the most basic things that everyone else contests >knows and posts nothing about his "beloved" shuttle other than "muh cargo muh passengers" >pretends that nothing he posts is opinion/conjecture, while constantly crying that others are doing it >doesn't even post related pictures with his autistic posts I like spaceflight, I like researching spaceflight, so I keep posting. 1.1
