>>1860004>I don't care about surveillance, the NSA can fuck off.Dont know if you mean you dont mind surveillance or you dont care for it, but either way if people are stuck in a city they are easier to watch and control. Turnstyles, cameras, scanners, patrols, etc. Spreading out is part of the cat and mouse game, and now they have to resort to drone patrols which is bad PR.
>But yes, more sparse housing means more roads, plumbing, etc per housing.Lets try 'reductio ad absurdum.' Ok so we need to force people to live in pods because it's cheaper/more-efficient? The point of the industrial revolution was to improve the standard of living and that means square footage baybayyyyyyyyyyy.. it's better for domestic relationships as well.
https://www.inc.com/chris-matyszczyk/want-a-happy-marriage-a-new-study-says-this-is-startling-number-of-square-feet-your-house-might-need.html>Want a Happy Marriage? A New Study Says This Is the Stunning Number of Square Feet Your House Might Need (100 Square Feet Too Little May Ruin Everything)Could it really be that there's a certain amount of space couples need to be happy? Physically, that is.The epitome of the eurocuck mindset is to convince yourself your little coffin apartment is all you need and you dont mind overpaying retail at the cornerstore, and oh if you cant get that thing you need it's all for the better. It's literally Stockholm syndrome. We should want big cars, big boobs, and eventually rockets to Mars!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Scarcity is a learned mindset, taught to you by public education.
>Once again, I'm asking you WHY ? What is the reasoning behind this "I want" you speak of ? We've already wasted enough time, let's get to it.Firstly because I dont trust the government and recent have proven that Mass Psychosis is real and that 30-70 percent of the population are brainwashed zombies ready to enforce whatever psychopathic rule the central planners come up with. Again squarefootage, distance, boundaries.
