>>1828170Yea I have been reading a LOT of bike fitting things and realizing you can come to a lot of conclusions. But one agreed upon thing is you can't use one measurement and 99% of "size charts" are misleading because of that fact.
Anyways, what part of my body tells you I need a smaller frame? Just want to know what is telling you that since I obviously can't tell.
>>1828174I will try that. But yea anatomic bars suck ass I might have to ditch them.
>>1828176>>1828173You two are giving me hope. This bike is really light and fast and I want to love it. But I know if it's the wrong size it's all wasted effort.
I thought about getting a shorter stem, but the thing is the bike already has a 100mm stem on it. Isn't that small for a 58cm/Large? I ask because I am worried if I'm putting such a small stem on a big frame, I maybe should just be on a smaller frame to begin with. BUT my damn legs are so long that a smaller frame has a lot of drop.
And yes this is true that this is a race frame and I will need to adjust to that to begin with. But I rode like 10 miles and had significant discomfort.
I suppose I should try a shorter stem to start. Just try 90? Is 80 already too short for the frame?