>>1757864>completely ignores the cost of infrastructure to support themsupport infrastructure for trams is the cheapest part compared to cars or buses
>also ignores that they're a health hazard for the last 2 years and probably for years to comesince when are trams more of a health hazard than road-based transport infrastructure?
>>1757858>chinks can't into tramshaha that's where you're wrong kiddo
BEHOLD: THE KOREAN T3
NOWHERE IS SAFE FROM THE MASS-PRODUCTION TRAM MENACE
(yes I know norks are basically soviets)