Quoted By:
So my city (Shitcago) has an elevated metro system (the "L") that is kind of well-known, at least in 'murica. Every once in a while, there are meme proposals to tear it down and replace it with subways like Boston and NYC did. This is because 1) we have intense winters that make maintaining an elevated electric railway a bitch, and 2) the look/noise apparently makes business-owners butthurt. On the other hand, this shit is iconic (a.k.a. muh culture, muh feels).
In your IMOs, is it worth to keep the "L" system eLevated, or would it be preferable to put it underground?
