>>1808583>>1808581Kek absolutely delusional. Its not reasonable to assume that will double especially with the challenges china is facing this decade.
>and if they've figured out reusable rockets by 2035 in the same class as Starship/SuperHeavyExactly how are they going to do that outside of espionage. Right now they're using soviet technology andthe starship/superheavy is much more advanced then we even realize, they aren't getting that in 12 years, especially not with the trouble they are facing internally.
>More importantly though, in context, I don't think China considers SpaceX & America as one item and instead compares itself more to NASA and legacy providers the world over, and in context of that, that statement could be true.So ignore the absolutely monumental lead your competition has and then you can pretend you are leading? Its ridiculous, NASA has the launch vehicles of SpaceX contracted for their missions, they are one and the same.
>SpaceX is in a class of its own and trying to compare yourself to them, when you're about a decade behind the curve is silly.Far more than a decade
>build a nuclear powered space shuttle. Lol, lmao, lol
