>>1921214>I agree with the point that nothing satisfies cagers so there is no point in accomodating them at your expense.Counterpoint--there isn't anything that satisfies cyclists.
>oh no, I can't share dedicated paths with pedestrians or golf carts>oh no, I can't cycle anywhere near cars going more than 35 mph (56 kmh)>oh no, sharrows don't count, I don't care if it's a 25 mph street that nobody travels on>oh no, I can't share the bike lane with parked cars, no matter if it was carved from an 11 foot wide traffic lane>oh no, this city is too car-centric despite every major thoroughfare having extra-wide sidewalks or bike lanes>oh no, "dotted line" bicycle paths, this is a shoah>oh no, just because I have my own infrastructure does NOT mean I will stay off yours>oh no, they REMOVED bicycle lanes for whatever reason and reverted to traffic patterns it was six months ago. THIS MEANS WAR! 