>>1438918>geoengineeringthe problem is they have a policy that is against acknowledging that they most certainly will HAVE TO resort to geoengineering at some point because it will discourage people to vote for regulations and licenses, ie cap and trade
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/the-infinite-optimism-of-physicist-david-deutsch/>Physicist David Deutsch is such a thinker. He is renowned for his ideas about quantum computation, and for his insistence that the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics is true.>Deutsch: Resource-depletion and overpopulation worries are fundamentally flawed. Climate change worries are fundamentally misdirected. Geoengineering is essential, unavoidable and is being downplayed and delayed because of the “moral hazard” that people will be distracted from reducing carbon dioxide emissions. The latter should be the third most important response, after geoengineering and mitigation of the effects of climate (changed and otherwise) on people. 