>>1139239>Boeing will have tapped out the entire 7X7 series within the next 40 years by 2057Uhh, what? They might be out of 7X7 numbers in the next couple years if they go ahead with the MOM aircraft and call it the 797 as expected.
>(see pic/vid related)That's an exceptionally terrible hybrid wing design They've already created better ones.
>(as in tail gas engines powering electric propellers via an alternator)There are also better existing experimental methods for aircraft hybridization than this.
>which Boeing has already done on their DreamlifterThe cargo versions of the 747 have always done this, decades before the Dreamlifter. The entire 747 platform was designed with an opening nose section in mind.
>engine nozzle thrust vectoring, used mainly for takeoffsUnless it was designed in a way that cut takeoff and landing distances massively, it would be pointless
pic related, what the 797 will very likely look like
