>>1752852>I don't remember seeing any proposals to drug test aspiring cyclistsAnd I don't see them for regular motorists either. It's just people with licenses like me get because we're heavier, take longer to stop, are harder to control, and have more blind spots. (At least that's the justification)
I chose that example because it clearly doesn't make sense to do that for another road user, to show I'm not here bawling about 'not fwair' like a children as OP is.
Fair =/= exactly the same
But, here:
>Just a system to ensure that they understand basic things like no riding on sidewalksThis is a problem with traffic control if the cyclist feel compelled to mount the sidewalk
>no blasting through crosswalks screaming at pedestrians to get out of the wayIt isn't the norm, and should they hit anyone or cause a problem, the cyclist will be downed or dead closeby to be held accountable, unlike motorists who could escape the scene.
Why don't you understand the difference?
>bicycles must travel in the same direction as motor vehicle traffic unless there is a marked two way bike lane.Those sorts of bike lanes aren't even safe and I refuse them.
