>>1246611>Oh fuck off. Try going 30+ below in an actual vehicle and see what happens. What a non-argument. I often do that with my car, motorcycle and bike, especialy when there is no need to go faster.
It is never realy an issue.
Why waste fuel at 130 when you reach your destination in time at 80-100?
>I have no idea what you're attempting to communicate here but if you're trying to imply the volume of cars on highways is equivalent to that of cyclists on other roads then you really have my noggin jogginNot on highways, but each cyclist replaces one car while taking up about 1/6th to 1/8th of the roadspacs.
The more cyclists on the road, the less cars on the road.
Since cyclists take up less space and can ride in a peloton just fine, there is less traffic with more cyclists.
Ever been to the Netherlands?
