>>1458111>You retards said the same thingumm schizo sweetie, im not the people in your head you are arguing with.. ive always believed people, especially business owners, will opt to purchase the cheapest most reliable shit they need to get the job done or get to their job
>>1458113>These are not smart people we're dealing with.Right because believing wholeheartedly what they tell you on mainstream media at face value is what makes YOU intelligent?
Actual big brains will think about an issue themselves and apply LOGIC and maybe their own life experiences, YOU KNOW SUCH AS HAVING FRIENDS THAT ARE ACTUAL OWNERS OF DELIVERY AND PICKUP BUSINESSES?
>evidence-free pronouncements>like wild speculation "that most delivery business will be battery evs) without knowing the fucking first thing about the business >deny observable and documented realityLIKE SMALL BUSINESS OWNERS ALWAYS CHOOSING THE ******SAFEST******** OPTION FOR THEIR BUSINESSES?!?!?!??!?!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!?!??!
HOW MANY SUCCESSFUL SMALL TO MEDIUM BUSINESSES ARE BLEEDING EDGE PIONEERS THAT INVEST IN BARELY USABLE SYSTEMS THAT LACK INFRASTRUCTURE AND EXPOSE THEM TO MORE VULNERABILITIES IN SCHEDULING?!??!?!?!??!?!?!?!!!?!?!??!?!?!?!??!?!?!?
>>1458162>make an obviously-false claim>like wild speculation "that most delivery business will be battery evs) without knowing the fucking first thing about the business >then ask for proof that it's wrongsee
>>1458113 saying i wasnt providing evidence even though i have cited that i have friends that own delivery and pick up businesses (more than one)
>then when you bother to link something proving them wrong they claim it's not a good source >some fucking CNN article saying that one fucking globalist meme business switched over part of their fleet >not taking into account THE MAJORITY OF SMALL BUSINESSES THAT ACTUAL FUCKING DEPEND ON THEIR VEHICLES AND DONT JUST PARK THEM IN A PARKING LOT FOR A PHOTO OP 