>>1456604>In Australia where the AEC (Australian Electoral Commission) funds candidates and parties based on their electoral performance, at a set $ per vote received, which could be another good model to follow.In Australia their government is notoriously nepotistic; has possibly more dark money per capita than in USA.
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/sep/03/australias-political-parties-got-62m-in-dark-money-donations-last-yearhttps://grattan.edu.au/podcast/dark-money-how-to-reform-australias-political-donations-system/www.baka.com.au/politics/federal/dark-money-70-million-in-major-party-income-is-untraceable-20170202-gu3kx8.htmlsydneydemocracynetwork.org/dark-money/Australia is notoriously fascistic and if your lifestyle falls outside what "boomer society" considers acceptable you're shit out of luck. Yet they also call themselves socialists just like in Nordic countries and claim to be not corrupt. But if you do investigation or talk to people that have worked in those governments it's extremely nepotistic and there's no practical way to stop it.
Can you see why reducing financial influence to secret deals like this one would be an advantage to billionaires because most regular millionaire level of rich people dont have the extensive Illuminati CFR connections? And btw it could and would still happen at lower levels but it just would be easier for the members of Bilderberg and people like that because they already have sophisticated social and business networks in place for exactly these reasons. So yes the schizo anon was correct that these leftist policies actually empower the mega rich by giving them a convenient "monopoly of violence" (government.)
If you dont believe me about the networks of influence look no further than the infamous MEGA GROUP, made infamous by one Jeffrey Epstein. It was much deeper with a massive Cabal of billionaires, pedos, politicians, spies, and royalty:
https://www.mintpressnews.com/tag/mega-group/ 