>>1171430>A picture of a helmetIn what way does that have any bearing on the assertion that bicycle helmets are not designed or certified to be effective in collisions with motor vehicles?
>Incorrect. A comprehensive review of 57 studies found…Slow down with those goalposts kid, you claimed that the data from professional cycling shows that helmets make cycling safer. The correct thing to do in this situation is concede that you were wrong instead of bringing up an unrelated dataset.
>>1171438>The only cyclists that would be forced off the road by helmet legislation are those who are either too stupid or too poor to wear a helmet.This is based on a faulty assumption: there is nothing stupid about not choosing to wear a helmet for most cyclists. Additionally, the frequency of injuries for those cyclists who wear helmets and continue to ride in a mandatory bicycle helmet environment experience injuries at an increased rate.