>>1706567>also QLED BTFOs OLED in every wayhere's a short comparison:
>viewing anglesoled
>black levelsoled
>bloomingoled
>screen uniformityoled
>color accuracyoled
>pixel response timeoled
>peak brightnessqled
lcds are competitive in bright rooms simply due to superior peak brightness but in a dark room even the best lcd on the market the Samsung Neo QLED QN90A simply cannot compete on any level vs an entry level oled from 4 years ago
pic related is a good demonstration, this is a scene from Gravity and you'll notice how bloomy and glowy the Samsung is, there simply is no LCD that can accurately reproduce these scenes with bright stars on a pitch black background
>so half the lifespan of a not-OLED display is "slight shorter" huh?in the grand scheme of things, yes
tvs have an inherently limited useful lifespan and within like 7-10 years you want to be upgrading anyway, modern oleds should last at least 5 years so the difference isn't that big
of course if you're willing to suffer inferior image quality qleds will last longer
similar to carbon, nothing competes with carbon on performance and at some point you'll just have to decide whether performance is more important to you or whether it'll last 10 years vs 20
