>>1838236Is the campaign against cars not part of a larger narrative? It would be like if we were talking about VAPING. The point is bodily autonomy and plenty of people make the same type of argument you do but about abortion. There's probably a name for this type of argument.
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/12/goodbye-car-ownership-hello-clean-air-this-is-the-future-of-transport/https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/07/3-circular-approaches-to-reduce-demand-for-critical-minerals/>A design process that focuses on fulfilling the underlying need instead of designing for product purchasing is fundamental to this transition. This is the mindset needed to redesign cities to *reduce private vehicles* and other usages.Hmm circular economy, doesn't sound like a *scam* at all? The bureaucratic central planners have done such a good job managing society so far and especially the *money supply?* Geee, whats the harm in giving them *more power* over the economy? Maybe if we gave up just a little more freedom then they'll finally get it right this time, because it wasn't real socialism in the past. The reason the lockdowns didn't work is because we didn't lockdown hard enough! The only problem with China is that it's not a *democracy.*
And what else would be such a potent symbol of individual freedom and the subsequent degradation of that than the American Car? Working class people actually had access to neighboring states without asking explicit permission or passing through checkpoints!
Bonus points New Zealand:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENEUktOrQV8https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RgnEJXdV_Qk 