>>1860002>Are you implying that if people are more spread out that it would require more surveillance infrastructure?I don't care about surveillance, the NSA can fuck off. But yes, more sparse housing means more roads, plumbing, etc per housing. And we know already suburbia can't pay for itself.
>Money is fake and gay.. look who prints most of it?Labor and resources are still real, and cannot be printed at the will of the Fed. Suburbia is still a waste of both.
>people like me could live in the communties that I want to live inOnce again, I'm asking you WHY ? What is the reasoning behind this "I want" you speak of ? We've already wasted enough time, let's get to it.
