>>1021313Just look at that piece of shit rail crossing over the other one. Can't even fucking turn.
>>1021315Yes this is an issue which will never be solved due to cost.
>>1021327Alternatively I can risk falling in front of a train if I take the overcrowded tube.
>>1021333>Modern trams in an urban environment with lots of traffic only make sense if they have a ROW. If the streets are small this would mean closing them off to regular traffic and leaving them exclusively for trams, at the most you can allow taxis as well. There's nothing wrong with having some streets only for public transit, and others only for private cars, lorries and bikes. It's generally never a good idea to mix public transit with any other traffic.There aren't enough roads to do this. How will people recieve deliveries? How will coaches run?
Buses have far better capacity and make better use of road space than trams.
You can fit 120 people with a tiny footprint, and it doesn't require any expensive and hazardous infrastructure. There will also never be signalling issues.