>>1100285>Biofuels are grown from conventional farming,https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algae_fuelRight now it's corrupt corn lobby bullshit but if someone fucking researched algae farming then it could be done with minimal impact to the environment and even could be potentially done off shore.
>Tesla doesn't weigh significantly more than an average car in AmericaMaybe not but you cannot change the fact that hydrocarbons or even hydrogen has an order of magnitude better energy density. You could make your bike lighter and TESLAS LIGHTER.
>Please tell me more about how commuting on electric bicycles is going to use more energy than a car. Apples 2 organges m9 i didnt fucking say that. But you would be using less energy if you had a small microturbine instead of the relatively yuuuge battery because your e bike would be lighter and wouldnt suffer the same lack of efficiency. You might think your e bike is light enough and thats cool but i would rather have a lighter bike with a more elegant engineering solution. Its not a fucking crazy conspiracy theory to say that companies are hesitant to develop a hybrid e-bike because they dont want to be labelled dirty carbon emitters and want to appeal to trendy millennials.
>using EV's in our urban areas will make our urban areas cleaner and more environmentally friendly for the people living there. Jesus christ man we're now officially going in circles look at this shit:
>>1099647You know brake dust and rubber particulates are arguably worse for health than FILTERED catalytic convertered exhaust ESPECIALLY IF IT WAS FROM BIOFUEL! Should DEEP FRYERS be banned to??
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/sep/11/polluting-effect-wear-brakes-tyres-pollutionwatch>The researchers found some roads where the air pollution benefits from improvements in diesel exhausts were outweighed by increases in particles that come from the wear of tyres, brakes and the roadYou know that black dust on the side of highways?
