>>1860017>ok dude ill just take your word for itYou'd do well. Suburbia is a surveillance walk in the park, and even comes with free volunteers who'll snitch on anyone they can.
>Sorry, not every latin phrase relating to logic is about fallacy.Nice try, but your retarded "if you don't need a McMansion you'll live in a pod !!!!!" IS indeed a 'slippery slope' fallacy. I know what a reduction to absurdity means, thanks.
>The point was that if we want to use living space efficiently we should share beds!How about you stop this childish false dichotomy ?
>The totally manufactured high cost of energyThat's another unrelated topic. Energy prices being dependent of global financial markets are a plague. Privatized for profit housing market is a plague responsible for the ungodly sky-high prices in attractive cities. Yes, I know. No, suburbia shit is not an answer.
I'm getting tired of your non-stop non-sequiturs and dumb "new miracle technology" articles. Let's get back to the real question: what justifies taking money from city-living people to fund suburbanites who decided to live miles away from the place they live or socialize in ? And what makes these suburbanites choose this life ? Answer directly the point.
