>>1266790>Incorrect. An expansion would include new runways that would be spaced further apart than they are now so they could all be used in foggy conditions. Right now one of each of the parallel runways has to shut down because they're too close to one another. So yes, it would add gates and capacity.This is objectively wrong. There are exactly zero runways being added to commercial airports in the state.The SFO expansion is no adding or even extending runways. The T1 rebuild yields a net gain of zero gates overall, but 4 'usable' gates. Not a single one of these slots will be used for a net increase in northern-southern California flights.
>Original estimate: $33 billion>Current estimate: $77-98 billion>"Oh it won't go any higher"Nice evidence. Oh wait.
>Base and low are synonyms. You should refine this statement.You sure are fucking stupid. Pic related.''
>Not an argument.Says the guys who hasn't stated a single contextually accurate thing in this whole thread.
>Read this againThat you, again making a factually inaccurate comparison that doesn't even correctly apply to the comparison actually being made
My advice is to get some evidence and say shit that isn't completely fucking wrong. Self-inflicted stupidity just hurts your "argument"
