>>1003352>What kind of cycling infrastructure do you like and don't like? I don't like any. All it does it harm me in practice.
>I generally like any kind of cycle path that is separated from motorized traffic. Shared lane markings are useful only on quiet roads; otherwise, they are useless.I would agree, however, you can't possibly have separated cycle paths which won't cause issue when you actually have to cross or turn or some shit.
>I don't understand why anybody would travel by bicycle on a busy road, especially if there's a perfectly good cycle path available to them. Why would somebody do that?Biggest reason is how utter shit most bike 'lanes' are.
>>1003364Bike lanes are the most poorly maintained part of the road, act as a trashcan for McFatties, will stop randomly, have you ride along doorzones,and in the event this is too much bullshit for you and you ride outside the lane, this enrages the McFatties which could literally, not exaggerated, end in my death.
>>1003371This. I still run into cager problems around town, but it's generally not ever a close-call hitting situation.
More just harassment and trying to scare me, but no lane will prevent that kind of behavior.
