>>1972179>Why does it need to be "innovative"?if you follow the thread the anon presented it as a good alternative to highways/rail, to be a decent alternative it would have to present some innovative solution to a problem that neither of those already address.
>Shouldn't the only thing that matters be if it works?it works measurably worse than any other established method of transportation and is therefore a failure.
>>1972174the copenhagen light metro is fully automated and driverless, and can safely maintain a margin of 1 minute between platform arrivals. it runs 24/7 and arrives every 80 seconds in rush hour. copenhagen has 100k less inhabitants than las vegas.
