>>1862343>5- Locals get pissed off they have to subsidize the livelihood of people who look down upon them and their culture, specially when they're also troublemakers.I've lived in high crime/immigrant areas before and the resentment that I noticed was more as a result of perceived discrimination and control measures enforced upon these people. People may feel the reason they are dependent on the local population is specifically because of the rules they can't help breaking which causes the locals to perceive them as "trouble makers." In this way it's a viscous cycle that reinforces cultural resentment!
I hated feeling scared to walk home or being harassed; hearing stories from friends. This behavior is separate discussion but I believe it stems from a lack of tribal layers of community organization and would be helped by establishing secure networks of trust, but would undermine TPTB. Basic concept that was implemented by Linus Torvalds:
https://www.gnuband.org/2007/09/18/linus_torvald_is_convinced_version_control_should_be_based_on_trust_networks/>If you have ever done any security work and it did not involve the concept of "network of trust. It wasn't security work, it was masturbation.When people are afraid of their neighbors either because of violence or because of "snitching" then its STASI "Zersetzung" tactics of turning people against eachother through penalties for everyday activity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSffz_bl6zo>Basically, those immigrants are being forcefully integrated because not doing so has caused too much conflict.Dangerous utilitarian justification. I've lived through enough social trends to realize at any moment the tables could turn and you could end up the "troublemaker." All the worst atrocities in history usually following a similar line of thinking. The best way to deal with difficult/sick humans is to give them a place to be and let them go their own way or else choose to leave the situation yourself. Going separate ways.
