>>1844919It varies depending on location, expected rail traffic, expected rail speed, and expected road traffic.
All the ones near me (Illinois) cover both sides of the road, but that was a federal requirement to increase train speed to 125 MPH.
Brightline has 79 MPH as a target top speed, so regulations don't require more than what we see.
If it's to minimize damage and disruption to rail service, then more expensive is fine. I wouldn't give a penny to rescue these morons from their poor choices.
>>1845005The fuck kind of counter is that? Can't have an on-topic discussion so you just start whining, eh?
