>>1097629>It's well into double digit percentage loss for the most egregious gear combinations.Um, no sweetie, see this is where you are making things up in your pretty little head. Look at the graph.
It's nearly 9 W with a perfectly straight 53-11 chainline, and then losses _decrease_ as you cross chain because the higher efficiency of larger cogs more than offset the puny impact chain line has.
Also, look at how the graph is cropped. It starts at 5 W and tops out at 10 W. We can see that the whole range - from best to worst cross chain combination - is within 3 W. That can be expressed as +/- 1.5 W deviation from a base line. You'd have to be outputting less than 150 W to even make it one whole percentage point. To make it double digits you'd be doing 15 W, or 30 W if we're being generous by comparing best to worst rather than base line. At 30 W you're barely staying upright, cheekums.
Sorry sweet cheeks, but you don't have a clue about these things. Keep raging about imaginary cross chain inefficiencies if you must, but do it up on your room and let the grown-ups talk undisturbed. Bye!
