>>1882076you're looking at rosy figures for energy consumption of wind. you're running on natural gas and burning natural gas & coal. the electricity numbers are put in these general terms because government's don't want people to know that the electricity they actually get from renewables is probably from burning wood & shit and some wind with a big helping hand from nuclear to keep the lights on.
>>1882082generation is a shit stat because you're giving wind a lay up for generating when it cannot actually deliver electricity to the grid. it's the way they dance around consumption.
>>1882180that's a 65 MW field in EGYPT you dumb fuck, not the UK. tell me the capacity factor of that field or any other huge fucking line of panels in the desert and it's still not gonna be above 30% the touted capacity. it's a lie, dawg. they dangle that "4,000 MW capacity!" shit in your face when the only thing that can deliver on that promise is a nuclear reactor.
