>>1165963Moore's law doesn't even apply to computer chips anymore. And WE ALREADY HAVE THE **PERFECT** ENERGY STORAGE MEDIUM. Even you designed a battery that had the same energy density as hydrocarbons IT WOULD NOT BE AS GOOD. Recharging is POINTLESS. YOU STILL HAVE TO PRODUCE THE ENERGY SOMEWHERE WHETHER IT'S AT A POWER PLANT OR IN A TURBINE.
YOU CAN PRODUCE BIOFUEL AT HOME. WHY NOT CUT THE MIDDLE MAN OUT?!?!?
Refilling a fuel tank is not any less convenient than charging a battery, IN FACT IT IS MORE CONVENIENT. And *YOU* *CAN* *MAKE* *BIOFUEL* *AT* *HOME.* It can be far more decentralized than power companies and the petrol industry. All you need is microbrial organisms and a container like a barrel or even old 2 liters.
>>1165957Maybe they want you to think it's a scam but they were actually paid off by opposing interests. It's suspected that this has happened in other cases and it's probable that at least some of those rumors are true. But anyway I was more pointing to the technology as a whole not just that specific iteration. It would not be that hard to produce a fuel cell OR EVEN MICROTURBINE that could harness the kind of energy that is contained in a fucking bic lighter, which is twice as much energy as in a giant heavy toxic iphone battery.
