>>1696215>there exist enough people that make 4 hour round trips to and from work that it's commonYour whole argument from
>>1695904 talked about "4 hours commuting" which you got called out on by
>>1695909. So when someone actually produces data instead of anecdotal nonsense (and by the way, no one denied 2 hour round trips or the possibility that 4 hour round trips exist), you try to backpedal and claim that "enough people" do it that it's "common", despite at best the newspapers will occasionally run a piece BECAUSE it's so rare. If you consider "less than 10%" common, that makes statements like "Trump-voting conservatives are commonly found in San Francisco" true by that some logic.
I'm sure that you'll try to poke holes in the argument, but "4 hours commuting" as you stated is a rare phenomenon but otherwise exaggeration.
