>>1760372Or, go out on a limb with me here because this is going to sound fucking crazy, but what if we focused on energy sources that don't turn built up areas with a ton of people living and working there into a dangerous wasteland that has to be evacuated in a matter of hours with literally no warning and right up until that point the shills were touting its foolproof safety features. Like what if we had energy sources where we didn't have to rely on some people saying "but it will be different this time I pinky swear those other designs weren't TRUE nuclear"
It's going to be like 30 years before any new plant proposed today goes into operation, so don't give me that "but we have nuckyulurs now and non-catastrophically-failure-prone energy sources need too much time to implement"
