>>1054132>non drive side pic>that rear brake cable>fancy base bars good for only one hand position ever>shitty pedals without foot retention on a quality FG/SS bike>#fitness>Keystone LightDo your parents know that their son is a failure?
>>1054122An expert said it's an excellent frame probably 54 or 56 cm... who are we to second guess an expert opinion? [/sarc]
>>1054040At 6'5", 61cm is about the smallest frame you could be comfortable on, unless you've got long arms and a short torso in which case it would definitely be too small.
These days there's not a huge difference between carbon and aluminum in general. The main reason to go for carbon fiber is the ultimate weight savings, if that's important to you and you can afford it, there's no reason not to ride carbon.
