>>1161881>Vulcan could go supersonicYeah so can a 747?! So can a human being if they jump from high enough? What is your point? Just admit you were wrong and dont desperately try to save face because that is even more cringy.
>replacing it with something like the TSR2 TSR2 was an interceptor/reconnaissance aircraft with limited nuclear capabilities and less payload capacity than an F-18 or F-16 despite being much larger. The TSR2 also had way less range than the v-bombers especially teh valiant and victor so it was not a real replacement. The v-bombers also had 2-4 times the payload. Tbh i dont see why everyone was so obsesed with the tsr2 and the arrow.. they weren't that impressive especially compared to american aircraft like the a-12 which had interceptor capability but could ACTUALLY hit mach-3 or even the american concepts like the rapier.
>50s designSo was pic related and it BTFO the brit's design because it was ACTUALLY supersonic.. not some transonic piece of shit that everyone falsely claims is supersonic.
