>>1297196>The MAX will nose upwow that sucks
>737 classic servo tabs interesting didn't know that?
>That said, I think manual reversion is dead. maybe but it's a nice concept that might be more suited to private aircraft so boomer billionaires can feel safe but youre right it's probably not cost effective for commercial planes
also it can lead to control jams which is exactly what happened to that dassault 900 or at least the control feel thing fucked up but the point is that mechanical links can jam up
https://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19990914-2then there is the ever present threat of solar flares and EMP which is ironic because the tension in a cable is also the electromagnetic force between the electrons of molecules as explained by feynman:
https://youtu.be/baXv_5z7HVYhttps://youtu.be/MO0r930Sn_8and the 747 was the nuclear doomsday aircraft so you might think that system would be best???? same with teh b52?
wouldnt hydraulics still work without electric power as long as the RAT pressurized the lines????
also i dont like relying on the RAT... to me that's cray cray
sorry my post is disorganized but im too lazy right now
pic related:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATLAS-I 