>>1041378Hmm yeah that might work.
>>1041379I tried to buy the FSA 30/46, but couldn't find it anywhere but their own website. Ended up with 34/44 rings on a 110BCD road crank. 44 feels about as big as I'll ever need, but the 34 could be smaller ( or I could bodge a bigger cassette, but it's already a 12-32... )
I'm not sure how well the 16t jump works, it was pretty annoying with 34/50, the usual cruising gear was right in the middle so that you were almost always cross chained...
>>1041385Yeah I guess this is one of those things that depends on where you live, what cadence you like, how heavy stuff do you carry and all that. Personally I'd enjoy that "wall climbing" 24.
But I don't get how triples would have bigger jumps? All I've ridden have around 10t jumps. 22/32/42 on my MTB. 30/39/50 (or 40 in middle.) on hybrids and the like
Usual double setup seems to be a 12-16t jump.
Also I find I get to ride with a better chainline with triples, but obviously there is the possibility to get it horribly wrong if you have no idea what you are doing.
>>1041387I think there are some issues with shifter/derailleur/chainline compatibility. I'd like to try a setup like that if it worked out mechanically.
>>1041389Right, exactly my thoughts.