>>1044347But it's okay to force your fucking cages on everyone?
You could read the site I gave that answers a lot of fucking questions.
American public transport is made shitty and than pointed to as a reason why public transport sucks.
In the car free city plans PT is kept top notch and clean with seating. You'll have trams and light rail which are more efficient with extra seating and no smog.
You are cager scum, cities suck balls especially in America because everything revolves around the cage. The holy altar with which everyone impales themselves on.
It's more of a retarded ideology and cultural myth than any actual practical reasons.
Getting through the city with only needing your feet is inherently more free than needing a car.
You build around the car you space out your cities more and more to accommodate more and more traffic defeating it's very purpose. Pollution and noise suddenly drops almost entirely once you get rid of the cars.
Like all cager scum you mistake mobility with accessbility. Who cares if you have a car if everything is so far away and clogged with other cagers that you can't get anywhere? And what people WHO CANT DRIVE? Oh that's right fuck them, they have to live in my auto-centric shithole so I can fulfill my meme myths of rugged individual with a car even though it's demonstrably not very free.
Or how about to maintain you shitty meme dream you have to drown development in red tape and requirements to do so? The biggest part of any car free plan is throwing out all the retarded zoning and minimum plot sizes and requirements. But suddenly conservatives and libertarians remain silent, when it's not convenient with their vision.
Or how about all the subsidies and tax right offs that goes to your cager infrastructure? You don't pay the true costs of it, and long term cities will never be able to maintain the never ending sprawl.
Stay blue pilled cager.
