>>1061350I'm not saying I don't care about them, I'm saying that it's not relevant to us, people browsing /n/. The sandniggers won't attack us.
>>1061351>care to elaborate?Look up 'North Minneapolis Greenway'. They're already doing trials by closing streets to vehicle traffic, but at some point the goal is to turn it into a full greenway running from the Grand Rounds trail (just west of Webber Park) down almost to Plymouth, and possibly eventually even further south to the other trails (i.e. Cedar Lake trail).
And, largely unrelated, another planned North Minneapolis trail is the Great Northern Greenway which will run from Theodor Wirth to the river, then if they can work out a deal with the railroad, maybe cross a rail bridge and connect into that little stretch of trail over in northeast, and then be extended all the way over to the Diaganol Trail
>Yes I agree but what I'mm saying is there's no really direct route, still hoping that they will eventually extend the greenway to st paul following the CP railroadYeah I hope they do that. I think they will. But even without a direct trail route, Minneapolis metro area still has hundreds of kilometers of paved trails and, while not perfect, there's no city that's better. (inb4 Netherlands/Holland/Denmark/etc fags)
>Also with the greenway getting torn up, I'm mainly referring to the proposal of putting a streetcar along side, which in retrospect will only happen after the SWLRT is built (so effectively never)They talk about stuff like that but there's too many cyclists, and too much support for cycling, for any bike trail, especially any major bike trail, to be removed.
>if any trail in Minneapolis need a bit of a touch up it would be some portions of the Hiawatha trail,You mean the trail following Hiawatha Avenue? The north part is fine imo. The south part is just an extra wide sidewalk, that part would be nice to have replaced with pavement
