>>1125421 In order of preference / consideration / priority / cost-effectiveness/efficiency:
1. Bus (yes you don't want people to walk too far hillside along the slopes in an already low density suburbs), plus roads and houses build out naturally along contours
>>1125430.
2. Any cable transport? (aerial cable car, gondola lift, cable railway, etc; including elevators) And escalators, paths, footbridges, moving walkway in urban settings.
3. Monorail: Both straddle-beam in the intermediate capacity / heavy rail role (eg Chongqing); and suspended in the light rapid transit shuttle / people mover role replacing cable transport (ie Skyrail in Midorizaka, Seno, Hiroshima apparently using linear motor)
>>1125482Yeah the problem is people. Don't live on hills right?
>>1125471Moves riders but not their goods, cargo, and baggage.
