>>1143599>Cities are a terrible place to live.As opposed to wholesome burbclaves with seven lane highways where no one goes outside except between their cage and house, and the only dining option is McDicks or Applefucks? And everyone is fat, sick, isolated, on white collar drugs, and spends their time watching TV and wishing they lived somewhere better.
Or the sticks, real great place. Can't drink the water, $20 is a lot of money, all the kids leave to those awful "cities" because there's no jobs in rural alabama, and there's nothing to do but fuck your cousin and see if your 20 year old television can pick up any signal today? Where the dining options are prepackaged food from the walmart because it's the only store within a four hour drive?
I've lived in a variety of places. Cities are best. Stuff to do, people around, you actually get social interaction, you get exercise (walking around, gym, cycle-commuting), there's decent food to eat, and gainful employment available.
Cages destroy communities. Even if you had a wholesome village, a cage just divides people and segments the community members from each other and their places of work and activity. It drives people apart to build highways and 10 miles of stripmalls between them.
Whether your community has 100, 1000, 10,000, 100,000, a million, or ten million population, any time in any case, it's better without cages.
